The North OC parcel of Coyote Lake NA is tucked away and not subject to human disturbances. Unfortunately a full survey was cut short by a flooded boot.

Typically seen across the lake, this OC is undisturbed due to the NCC lands to the North and a work of the grazing lease holder to the South.
A Coyote By Any Other Name. Mr. Wall, the lease holder for the Central-PNT and a local land owner, asks people to park at the oil field site south of RR 494 and the RR 44A access point. He indicated that the road is impassable, despite county improvement. Mr. Wall also re-counted the story behind Coyote Lake name. Apparently his father thought the previous name, Horseshoe Lake, was not an accurate description and that it looked more like a track of a coyote. Mr. Wall senior started calling it by this name and it stuck.
Have You Seen My Boot. Unfortunately, a flooded boot resulted in cutting the visit short. I did notice that there is a cut line running North from the South Boundary of the OC. I may have to go back… but wear snowshoes this time!
Inspection Report: 2024-11-06: Coyote Lake (OC) (NA); Phrank P.
| Question | Q## | Response |
| General Information | ||
| Date/Site/Submitter: | Q21/22/12 | 2024-11-06: Coyote Lake (OC) (NA); Phrank P. |
| Guest Names | Q14 | |
| SAPAA Member | Q16 | Yes |
| Over all Impression of the Site | ||
| What is the Naturalness of the Site? 4=Great, 0=Terrible | Q31 | 4 – Great |
| How Natural?: comments | Q32 | An undisturbed parcel of land which is protected by the grazing lease to the west and south and the NCC lands to the North, as well as the lake itself. For the section surveyed, no obvious human activity. |
| How was your visit to the PA? | ||
| Trip Duration | Q41 | Pass by but did not Go In |
| Why Did you Go? | Q42 | Other (see comments) |
| Visit Details | Q43 | Fleshing out YEGVille.ca, see: http://yegville.ca/2024/11/06/coyote-lk-north-oc/ |
| What is in the Site? | ||
| Ease to Visit | Q51 | No Amenities, No Signage |
| Biological Observations | Q52 | It is technically possible to visit from the North via the NCC lands. This is also the preference of the PNT-lease holder, Mr. Wall. Thick black spruce forests interspersed with willow and other typical vegetation found in a lake environment. |
| Submissions to iNaturalist | Q53 | No, did not see anything of note |
| Geological Observations | Q54 | Undulating low hills creates depressions and wet areas. |
| Designation as a Protected Area | Q55 | Fencing |
| Comments | Q56 | Fencing in good shape as expected from a grazing lease. |
| Human Activities/Disturbances | ||
| Agricultural Activities | Q61 | None noted |
| Resource extraction | Q62 | Oil/Gas wells |
| Motorized disturbances (ATV or vehicle activity). | Q63 | None Noted |
| Animal or self propelled activities | Q64 | None Noted |
| Gathering and Dumping Activities | Q65 | None Noted |
| Infrastructure encroachment | Q66 | Cut lines |
| Comments | Q67 | There is a cut line from the South boundary heading North toward the lake. This was not explored due to time considerations. |
| What Needs to be Done? | ||
| Remediation/Protection Activities Needed | Q71 | Signs |
| What Have you Done Recently to Help the site? | Q72 | Visit and Submitted This Report! |
| Nearby Stewards? | Q73 | Mr. Wall, the local grazing lease holder is interested in being a more official steward. |
| Comments | Q74 | |
| Last Words | Q82 | This was part of an intended multi-site visit. Unfortunately, a misstep and a waterlogged boot necessitated a hasty retreat. I plan to go back when the ground is more frozen and continue the survey of the area. |













